Comparison of a Novel Occluder Versus Traditional Occluder in Atrial Septal Defect: A Randomized Trial.

Fang Y, Li M, Zhang Z, Zhang C, Fang Z, Zhang D, Liu H, Pan W, Zhou D, Ge J

Open source

DOI
10.1161/jaha.125.045052
Published
2026 Sep 18
Container
Journal of the American Heart Association
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
no

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1161/jaha.125.045052,
  title = {Comparison of a Novel Occluder Versus Traditional Occluder in Atrial Septal Defect: A Randomized Trial.},
  author = {Fang Y and Li M and Zhang Z and Zhang C and Fang Z and Zhang D and Liu H and Pan W and Zhou D and Ge J},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {Journal of the American Heart Association},
  doi = {10.1161/jaha.125.045052},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1161/jaha.125.045052}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Comparison of a Novel Occluder Versus Traditional Occluder in Atrial Septal Defect: A Randomized Trial.
AU  - Fang Y
AU  - Li M
AU  - Zhang Z
AU  - Zhang C
AU  - Fang Z
AU  - Zhang D
AU  - Liu H
AU  - Pan W
AU  - Zhou D
AU  - Ge J
PY  - 2026
JO  - Journal of the American Heart Association
DO  - 10.1161/jaha.125.045052
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1161/jaha.125.045052
ER  - 

APA

Y, F., M, L., Z, Z., C, Z., Z, F., D, Z., H, L., W, P., D, Z., & J, G. (2026). Comparison of a Novel Occluder Versus Traditional Occluder in Atrial Septal Defect: A Randomized Trial.. Journal of the American Heart Association. https://doi.org/10.1161/jaha.125.045052

Source records