Poor Transparency of Legal Methods in Empirical Studies of the Effects of Law: A Case Study of Health Policy Research.

Burris S, Villamil Grest C, Herpolsheimer A

DOI: 10.1177/0193841x261479457
Published: 2026 Aug 24
Container: Evaluation review
Publisher: Not recorded
Open access: unknown

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1177/0193841x261479457,
  title = {Poor Transparency of Legal Methods in Empirical Studies of the Effects of Law: A Case Study of Health Policy Research.},
  author = {Burris S and Villamil Grest C and Herpolsheimer A},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {Evaluation review},
  doi = {10.1177/0193841x261479457},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841x261479457}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Poor Transparency of Legal Methods in Empirical Studies of the Effects of Law: A Case Study of Health Policy Research.
AU  - Burris S
AU  - Villamil Grest C
AU  - Herpolsheimer A
PY  - 2026
JO  - Evaluation review
DO  - 10.1177/0193841x261479457
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841x261479457
ER  -

APA

S, B., C, V. G., & A, H. (2026). Poor Transparency of Legal Methods in Empirical Studies of the Effects of Law: A Case Study of Health Policy Research.. Evaluation review. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841x261479457

Source records

pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-25T11:56:39.693Z