Educators’ Views on the Use of Dissection and Dissection Alternatives in American Biology Classrooms
- DOI
- 10.1177/02611929221096578
- Published
- 2022-05
- Container
- Alternatives to Laboratory Animals
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1177/02611929221096578,
title = {Educators’ Views on the Use of Dissection and Dissection Alternatives in American Biology Classrooms},
author = {Pamela Osenkowski and Ignas Karaliunas and Merari Diorio},
year = {2022},
journal = {Alternatives to Laboratory Animals},
doi = {10.1177/02611929221096578},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1177/02611929221096578}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Educators’ Views on the Use of Dissection and Dissection Alternatives in American Biology Classrooms AU - Pamela Osenkowski AU - Ignas Karaliunas AU - Merari Diorio PY - 2022 JO - Alternatives to Laboratory Animals DO - 10.1177/02611929221096578 UR - https://doi.org/10.1177/02611929221096578 ER -
APA
Osenkowski, P., Karaliunas, I., & Diorio, M. (2022). Educators’ Views on the Use of Dissection and Dissection Alternatives in American Biology Classrooms. Alternatives to Laboratory Animals. https://doi.org/10.1177/02611929221096578
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-09-26T21:02:59.127Z