Knowledge quality: A review and a revised conceptual model
- DOI
- 10.1177/0266666914539694
- Published
- 2016-06
- Container
- Information Development
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- no
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1177/0266666914539694,
title = {Knowledge quality: A review and a revised conceptual model},
author = {Mehwish Waheed and Kiran Kaur},
year = {2016},
journal = {Information Development},
doi = {10.1177/0266666914539694},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666914539694}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Knowledge quality: A review and a revised conceptual model AU - Mehwish Waheed AU - Kiran Kaur PY - 2016 JO - Information Development DO - 10.1177/0266666914539694 UR - https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666914539694 ER -
APA
Waheed, M., & Kaur, K. (2016). Knowledge quality: A review and a revised conceptual model. Information Development. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666914539694
Source records
- hal · retrieved 2026-09-25T12:37:41.500Z