Minimally invasive versus conventional extracorporeal circulation in cardiac surgery: A meta-analysis of 41 randomized controlled trials.
- DOI
- 10.1177/02676591261488596
- Published
- 2026 Sep 11
- Container
- Perfusion
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1177/02676591261488596,
title = {Minimally invasive versus conventional extracorporeal circulation in cardiac surgery: A meta-analysis of 41 randomized controlled trials.},
author = {Motawea KR and Ahmed MS and Khalil M and Ibrahim M and Abdelkader Y and Pelletier M and El Diasty M and Elgudin Y and Sabik JF 3rd and Abu-Omar Y},
year = {2026},
journal = {Perfusion},
doi = {10.1177/02676591261488596},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1177/02676591261488596}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Minimally invasive versus conventional extracorporeal circulation in cardiac surgery: A meta-analysis of 41 randomized controlled trials. AU - Motawea KR AU - Ahmed MS AU - Khalil M AU - Ibrahim M AU - Abdelkader Y AU - Pelletier M AU - El Diasty M AU - Elgudin Y AU - Sabik JF 3rd AU - Abu-Omar Y PY - 2026 JO - Perfusion DO - 10.1177/02676591261488596 UR - https://doi.org/10.1177/02676591261488596 ER -
APA
KR, M., MS, A., M, K., M, I., Y, A., M, P., M, E. D., Y, E., 3rd, S. J., & Y, A. (2026). Minimally invasive versus conventional extracorporeal circulation in cardiac surgery: A meta-analysis of 41 randomized controlled trials.. Perfusion. https://doi.org/10.1177/02676591261488596
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T08:50:28.747Z