Minimally invasive versus conventional extracorporeal circulation in cardiac surgery: A meta-analysis of 41 randomized controlled trials.

Motawea KR, Ahmed MS, Khalil M, Ibrahim M, Abdelkader Y, Pelletier M, El Diasty M, Elgudin Y, Sabik JF 3rd, Abu-Omar Y

Open source

DOI
10.1177/02676591261488596
Published
2026 Sep 11
Container
Perfusion
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
unknown

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1177/02676591261488596,
  title = {Minimally invasive versus conventional extracorporeal circulation in cardiac surgery: A meta-analysis of 41 randomized controlled trials.},
  author = {Motawea KR and Ahmed MS and Khalil M and Ibrahim M and Abdelkader Y and Pelletier M and El Diasty M and Elgudin Y and Sabik JF 3rd and Abu-Omar Y},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {Perfusion},
  doi = {10.1177/02676591261488596},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1177/02676591261488596}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Minimally invasive versus conventional extracorporeal circulation in cardiac surgery: A meta-analysis of 41 randomized controlled trials.
AU  - Motawea KR
AU  - Ahmed MS
AU  - Khalil M
AU  - Ibrahim M
AU  - Abdelkader Y
AU  - Pelletier M
AU  - El Diasty M
AU  - Elgudin Y
AU  - Sabik JF 3rd
AU  - Abu-Omar Y
PY  - 2026
JO  - Perfusion
DO  - 10.1177/02676591261488596
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1177/02676591261488596
ER  - 

APA

KR, M., MS, A., M, K., M, I., Y, A., M, P., M, E. D., Y, E., 3rd, S. J., & Y, A. (2026). Minimally invasive versus conventional extracorporeal circulation in cardiac surgery: A meta-analysis of 41 randomized controlled trials.. Perfusion. https://doi.org/10.1177/02676591261488596

Source records