What Determines the Preference to Coreside? Applying the Andersen-Newman Framework to a Lagged Longitudinal Analysis Among Older Adults in China

Rongjun Sun, Zachary Zimmer

Open source

DOI
10.1177/08982643261502730
Published
2026-11-03
Container
Journal of Aging and Health
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Open access
unknown

Credibility signals

uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1177/08982643261502730,
  title = {What Determines the Preference to Coreside? Applying the Andersen-Newman Framework to a Lagged Longitudinal Analysis Among Older Adults in China},
  author = {Rongjun Sun and Zachary Zimmer},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {Journal of Aging and Health},
  doi = {10.1177/08982643261502730},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1177/08982643261502730}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - What Determines the Preference to Coreside? Applying the Andersen-Newman Framework to a Lagged Longitudinal Analysis Among Older Adults in China
AU  - Rongjun Sun
AU  - Zachary Zimmer
PY  - 2026
JO  - Journal of Aging and Health
DO  - 10.1177/08982643261502730
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1177/08982643261502730
ER  - 

APA

Sun, R., & Zimmer, Z. (2026). What Determines the Preference to Coreside? Applying the Andersen-Newman Framework to a Lagged Longitudinal Analysis Among Older Adults in China. Journal of Aging and Health. https://doi.org/10.1177/08982643261502730

Source records