How generative artificial intelligence portrays science: Interviewing ChatGPT from the perspective of different audience segments
- DOI
- 10.1177/09636625241268910
- Published
- 2024-09-29
- Container
- Public Understanding of Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1177/09636625241268910,
title = {How generative artificial intelligence portrays science: Interviewing ChatGPT from the perspective of different audience segments},
author = {Sophia Charlotte Volk and Mike S. Schäfer and Damiano Lombardi and Daniela Mahl and Xiaoyue Yan},
year = {2024},
journal = {Public Understanding of Science},
doi = {10.1177/09636625241268910},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1177/09636625241268910}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - How generative artificial intelligence portrays science: Interviewing ChatGPT from the perspective of different audience segments AU - Sophia Charlotte Volk AU - Mike S. Schäfer AU - Damiano Lombardi AU - Daniela Mahl AU - Xiaoyue Yan PY - 2024 JO - Public Understanding of Science DO - 10.1177/09636625241268910 UR - https://doi.org/10.1177/09636625241268910 ER -
APA
Volk, S. C., Schäfer, M. S., Lombardi, D., Mahl, D., & Yan, X. (2024). How generative artificial intelligence portrays science: Interviewing ChatGPT from the perspective of different audience segments. Public Understanding of Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/09636625241268910
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-09-25T12:54:41.179Z