COVID scientists as rhetorical citizens: Persuasive op-eds and public debate over science policy.

Syfert C, Ceccarelli L

DOI: 10.1177/09636625241304064
Published: 2025 Jul
Container: Public understanding of science (Bristol, England)
Publisher: Not recorded
Open access: unknown

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1177/09636625241304064,
  title = {COVID scientists as rhetorical citizens: Persuasive op-eds and public debate over science policy.},
  author = {Syfert C and Ceccarelli L},
  year = {2025},
  journal = {Public understanding of science (Bristol, England)},
  doi = {10.1177/09636625241304064},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1177/09636625241304064}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - COVID scientists as rhetorical citizens: Persuasive op-eds and public debate over science policy.
AU  - Syfert C
AU  - Ceccarelli L
PY  - 2025
JO  - Public understanding of science (Bristol, England)
DO  - 10.1177/09636625241304064
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1177/09636625241304064
ER  -

APA

C, S., & L, C. (2025). COVID scientists as rhetorical citizens: Persuasive op-eds and public debate over science policy.. Public understanding of science (Bristol, England). https://doi.org/10.1177/09636625241304064

Source records

pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-25T14:38:16.274Z