Efficacy of Sensory Electrical Stimulation Versus Alternating Electromyography-Guided Electrical Stimulation on Functional Recovery of the Hand in Chronic Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial
- DOI
- 10.1177/10538135261496135
- Published
- 2026-10-14
- Container
- NeuroRehabilitation
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1177/10538135261496135,
title = {Efficacy of Sensory Electrical Stimulation Versus Alternating Electromyography-Guided Electrical Stimulation on Functional Recovery of the Hand in Chronic Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial},
author = {Dany Alphonse Anwar Habib and Mohamed Emam and Ahmed Elsayed and Abd El-Hamied Ibrahim El-Sayed Mohammad El-sherbini and Reham Ali Mohamed Ali Ahmed},
year = {2026},
journal = {NeuroRehabilitation},
doi = {10.1177/10538135261496135},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1177/10538135261496135}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Efficacy of Sensory Electrical Stimulation Versus Alternating Electromyography-Guided Electrical Stimulation on Functional Recovery of the Hand in Chronic Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial AU - Dany Alphonse Anwar Habib AU - Mohamed Emam AU - Ahmed Elsayed AU - Abd El-Hamied Ibrahim El-Sayed Mohammad El-sherbini AU - Reham Ali Mohamed Ali Ahmed PY - 2026 JO - NeuroRehabilitation DO - 10.1177/10538135261496135 UR - https://doi.org/10.1177/10538135261496135 ER -
APA
Habib, D. A. A., Emam, M., Elsayed, A., El-sherbini, A. E. I. E. M., & Ahmed, R. A. M. A. (2026). Efficacy of Sensory Electrical Stimulation Versus Alternating Electromyography-Guided Electrical Stimulation on Functional Recovery of the Hand in Chronic Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial. NeuroRehabilitation. https://doi.org/10.1177/10538135261496135
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-11-10T13:43:55.001Z