Shortening Affect Scales for Ambulatory Assessment: A Comparison of Different Item Response Theory-Based Approaches.
- DOI
- 10.1177/10731911261484340
- Published
- 2026 Sep 25
- Container
- Assessment
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1177/10731911261484340,
title = {Shortening Affect Scales for Ambulatory Assessment: A Comparison of Different Item Response Theory-Based Approaches.},
author = {Eisele G and Ulitzsch E and Pihlajamäki M and Myin-Germeys I and Bakker J and Kirtley OJ and Lachowicz AM and Van den Noortgate W and Schneider S},
year = {2026},
journal = {Assessment},
doi = {10.1177/10731911261484340},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911261484340}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Shortening Affect Scales for Ambulatory Assessment: A Comparison of Different Item Response Theory-Based Approaches. AU - Eisele G AU - Ulitzsch E AU - Pihlajamäki M AU - Myin-Germeys I AU - Bakker J AU - Kirtley OJ AU - Lachowicz AM AU - Van den Noortgate W AU - Schneider S PY - 2026 JO - Assessment DO - 10.1177/10731911261484340 UR - https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911261484340 ER -
APA
G, E., E, U., M, P., I, M., J, B., OJ, K., AM, L., W, V. D. N., & S, S. (2026). Shortening Affect Scales for Ambulatory Assessment: A Comparison of Different Item Response Theory-Based Approaches.. Assessment. https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911261484340
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T12:19:15.889Z