Preservative-free 0.01% bimatoprost versus other formulations for glaucoma and OHT: Systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy and safety
- DOI
- 10.1177/11206721261436125
- Published
- 2026-04-01
- Container
- European Journal of Ophthalmology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1177/11206721261436125,
title = {Preservative-free 0.01\% bimatoprost versus other formulations for glaucoma and OHT: Systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy and safety},
author = {Alina Popa Cherecheanu and Ronald Marinus Petrus Cornelis de Crom and Louise Baschet and Cindy Mary-Lynn Hutnik and Leopold Schmetterer},
year = {2026},
journal = {European Journal of Ophthalmology},
doi = {10.1177/11206721261436125},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1177/11206721261436125}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Preservative-free 0.01% bimatoprost versus other formulations for glaucoma and OHT: Systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy and safety AU - Alina Popa Cherecheanu AU - Ronald Marinus Petrus Cornelis de Crom AU - Louise Baschet AU - Cindy Mary-Lynn Hutnik AU - Leopold Schmetterer PY - 2026 JO - European Journal of Ophthalmology DO - 10.1177/11206721261436125 UR - https://doi.org/10.1177/11206721261436125 ER -
APA
Cherecheanu, A. P., Crom, R. M. P. C. D., Baschet, L., Hutnik, C. M., & Schmetterer, L. (2026). Preservative-free 0.01% bimatoprost versus other formulations for glaucoma and OHT: Systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy and safety. European Journal of Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1177/11206721261436125
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-09-26T14:14:31.476Z