Preservative-free 0.01% bimatoprost versus other formulations for glaucoma and OHT: Systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy and safety

Alina Popa Cherecheanu, Ronald Marinus Petrus Cornelis de Crom, Louise Baschet, Cindy Mary-Lynn Hutnik, Leopold Schmetterer

Open source

DOI
10.1177/11206721261436125
Published
2026-04-01
Container
European Journal of Ophthalmology
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Open access
unknown

Credibility signals

uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1177/11206721261436125,
  title = {Preservative-free 0.01\% bimatoprost versus other formulations for glaucoma and OHT: Systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy and safety},
  author = {Alina Popa Cherecheanu and Ronald Marinus Petrus Cornelis de Crom and Louise Baschet and Cindy Mary-Lynn Hutnik and Leopold Schmetterer},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {European Journal of Ophthalmology},
  doi = {10.1177/11206721261436125},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1177/11206721261436125}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Preservative-free 0.01% bimatoprost versus other formulations for glaucoma and OHT: Systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy and safety
AU  - Alina Popa Cherecheanu
AU  - Ronald Marinus Petrus Cornelis de Crom
AU  - Louise Baschet
AU  - Cindy Mary-Lynn Hutnik
AU  - Leopold Schmetterer
PY  - 2026
JO  - European Journal of Ophthalmology
DO  - 10.1177/11206721261436125
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1177/11206721261436125
ER  - 

APA

Cherecheanu, A. P., Crom, R. M. P. C. D., Baschet, L., Hutnik, C. M., & Schmetterer, L. (2026). Preservative-free 0.01% bimatoprost versus other formulations for glaucoma and OHT: Systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy and safety. European Journal of Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1177/11206721261436125

Source records