How do experts define relevance criteria when initiating Health Impact Assessments of national policies?

Stella RJ Kraemer, Gabriel Gulis

Open source

DOI
10.1177/1403494813504254
Published
2013-09-13
Container
Scandinavian Journal of Public Health
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Open access
unknown

Credibility signals

uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1177/1403494813504254,
  title = {How do experts define relevance criteria when initiating Health Impact Assessments of national policies?},
  author = {Stella RJ Kraemer and Gabriel Gulis},
  year = {2013},
  journal = {Scandinavian Journal of Public Health},
  doi = {10.1177/1403494813504254},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494813504254}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - How do experts define relevance criteria when initiating Health Impact Assessments of national policies?
AU  - Stella RJ Kraemer
AU  - Gabriel Gulis
PY  - 2013
JO  - Scandinavian Journal of Public Health
DO  - 10.1177/1403494813504254
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494813504254
ER  - 

APA

Kraemer, S. R., & Gulis, G. (2013). How do experts define relevance criteria when initiating Health Impact Assessments of national policies?. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health. https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494813504254

Source records