A Randomized, Double Blind, Sham-Controlled Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy of Electrical Vestibular Nerve Stimulation (VeNS), Compared to a Sham Control for Generalized Anxiety Disorder.
- DOI
- 10.1177/15500594251328080
- Published
- 2026 Mar
- Container
- Clinical EEG and neuroscience
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1177/15500594251328080,
title = {A Randomized, Double Blind, Sham-Controlled Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy of Electrical Vestibular Nerve Stimulation (VeNS), Compared to a Sham Control for Generalized Anxiety Disorder.},
author = {Kumar Goothy SS and S Chouhan R and Raghavan RV and Ratajczak W and Watson S and Robinson R and Macias S and Mckeown J},
year = {2026},
journal = {Clinical EEG and neuroscience},
doi = {10.1177/15500594251328080},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1177/15500594251328080}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - A Randomized, Double Blind, Sham-Controlled Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy of Electrical Vestibular Nerve Stimulation (VeNS), Compared to a Sham Control for Generalized Anxiety Disorder. AU - Kumar Goothy SS AU - S Chouhan R AU - Raghavan RV AU - Ratajczak W AU - Watson S AU - Robinson R AU - Macias S AU - Mckeown J PY - 2026 JO - Clinical EEG and neuroscience DO - 10.1177/15500594251328080 UR - https://doi.org/10.1177/15500594251328080 ER -
APA
SS, K. G., R, S. C., RV, R., W, R., S, W., R, R., S, M., & J, M. (2026). A Randomized, Double Blind, Sham-Controlled Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy of Electrical Vestibular Nerve Stimulation (VeNS), Compared to a Sham Control for Generalized Anxiety Disorder.. Clinical EEG and neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1177/15500594251328080
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-27T14:22:45.530Z