A review of current practice in the design and analysis of extremely small stepped-wedge cluster randomized trials.
- DOI
- 10.1177/17407745241276137
- Published
- 2025 Feb
- Container
- Clinical trials (London, England)
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1177/17407745241276137,
title = {A review of current practice in the design and analysis of extremely small stepped-wedge cluster randomized trials.},
author = {Tong G and Nevins P and Ryan M and Davis-Plourde K and Ouyang Y and Pereira Macedo JA and Meng C and Wang X and Caille A and Li F and Taljaard M},
year = {2025},
journal = {Clinical trials (London, England)},
doi = {10.1177/17407745241276137},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1177/17407745241276137}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - A review of current practice in the design and analysis of extremely small stepped-wedge cluster randomized trials. AU - Tong G AU - Nevins P AU - Ryan M AU - Davis-Plourde K AU - Ouyang Y AU - Pereira Macedo JA AU - Meng C AU - Wang X AU - Caille A AU - Li F AU - Taljaard M PY - 2025 JO - Clinical trials (London, England) DO - 10.1177/17407745241276137 UR - https://doi.org/10.1177/17407745241276137 ER -
APA
G, T., P, N., M, R., K, D., Y, O., JA, P. M., C, M., X, W., A, C., F, L., & M, T. (2025). A review of current practice in the design and analysis of extremely small stepped-wedge cluster randomized trials.. Clinical trials (London, England). https://doi.org/10.1177/17407745241276137
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-25T21:40:11.424Z