Rejoinder: "Adaptive versus fixed designs in confirmatory clinical trials: Centering the choice on ethics".

Baas S, Pin L, Robertson DS, London AJ, Sheehan M, Villar SS

Open source

DOI
10.1177/17407745261469874
Published
2026 Aug 3
Container
Clinical trials (London, England)
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
unknown

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1177/17407745261469874,
  title = {Rejoinder: "Adaptive versus fixed designs in confirmatory clinical trials: Centering the choice on ethics".},
  author = {Baas S and Pin L and Robertson DS and London AJ and Sheehan M and Villar SS},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {Clinical trials (London, England)},
  doi = {10.1177/17407745261469874},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1177/17407745261469874}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Rejoinder: "Adaptive versus fixed designs in confirmatory clinical trials: Centering the choice on ethics".
AU  - Baas S
AU  - Pin L
AU  - Robertson DS
AU  - London AJ
AU  - Sheehan M
AU  - Villar SS
PY  - 2026
JO  - Clinical trials (London, England)
DO  - 10.1177/17407745261469874
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1177/17407745261469874
ER  - 

APA

S, B., L, P., DS, R., AJ, L., M, S., & SS, V. (2026). Rejoinder: "Adaptive versus fixed designs in confirmatory clinical trials: Centering the choice on ethics".. Clinical trials (London, England). https://doi.org/10.1177/17407745261469874

Source records