Estimating the Prevalence of Replication Research Is Challenging, Not Least Because Even a Thorough Database Search Can Be Shallow.

Rakow T

Open source

DOI
10.1177/17456916261452961
Published
2026 Aug 28
Container
Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
unknown

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1177/17456916261452961,
  title = {Estimating the Prevalence of Replication Research Is Challenging, Not Least Because Even a Thorough Database Search Can Be Shallow.},
  author = {Rakow T},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science},
  doi = {10.1177/17456916261452961},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916261452961}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Estimating the Prevalence of Replication Research Is Challenging, Not Least Because Even a Thorough Database Search Can Be Shallow.
AU  - Rakow T
PY  - 2026
JO  - Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science
DO  - 10.1177/17456916261452961
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916261452961
ER  - 

APA

T, R. (2026). Estimating the Prevalence of Replication Research Is Challenging, Not Least Because Even a Thorough Database Search Can Be Shallow.. Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916261452961

Source records