PROTOCOL: Comparative Effectiveness of Tools for Communicating Health Research Results to Study Participants and Others With Relevant Lived Experience: A Living Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Nassar EL, Adams CE, Rice DB, Wurz A, South A, Boruff J, Golberg M, Carrier ME, Bartlett SJ, Gillies K, Kocher A, Kwakkenbos L, Ndosi M, Sydes MR, Benedetti A, Thombs BD, SPIN Patient Engagement Advisory Team

Open source

DOI: 10.1177/18911803261435896
Published: 2026 Mar
Container: Campbell systematic reviews
Publisher: Not recorded
Open access: yes

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1177/18911803261435896,
  title = {PROTOCOL: Comparative Effectiveness of Tools for Communicating Health Research Results to Study Participants and Others With Relevant Lived Experience: A Living Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.},
  author = {Nassar EL and Adams CE and Rice DB and Wurz A and South A and Boruff J and Golberg M and Carrier ME and Bartlett SJ and Gillies K and Kocher A and Kwakkenbos L and Ndosi M and Sydes MR and Benedetti A and Thombs BD and SPIN Patient Engagement Advisory Team},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {Campbell systematic reviews},
  doi = {10.1177/18911803261435896},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1177/18911803261435896}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - PROTOCOL: Comparative Effectiveness of Tools for Communicating Health Research Results to Study Participants and Others With Relevant Lived Experience: A Living Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.
AU  - Nassar EL
AU  - Adams CE
AU  - Rice DB
AU  - Wurz A
AU  - South A
AU  - Boruff J
AU  - Golberg M
AU  - Carrier ME
AU  - Bartlett SJ
AU  - Gillies K
AU  - Kocher A
AU  - Kwakkenbos L
AU  - Ndosi M
AU  - Sydes MR
AU  - Benedetti A
AU  - Thombs BD
AU  - SPIN Patient Engagement Advisory Team
PY  - 2026
JO  - Campbell systematic reviews
DO  - 10.1177/18911803261435896
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1177/18911803261435896
ER  -

APA

EL, N., CE, A., DB, R., A, W., A, S., J, B., M, G., ME, C., SJ, B., K, G., A, K., L, K., M, N., MR, S., A, B., BD, T., & Team, S. P. E. A. (2026). PROTOCOL: Comparative Effectiveness of Tools for Communicating Health Research Results to Study Participants and Others With Relevant Lived Experience: A Living Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.. Campbell systematic reviews. https://doi.org/10.1177/18911803261435896

Source records

pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-25T23:23:26.926Z