Patient-reported outcome measures in MS: Do development processes and patient involvement support valid quantification of clinically important variables?
- DOI
- 10.1177/20552173221105642
- Published
- 2022 Apr-Jun
- Container
- Multiple sclerosis journal - experimental, translational and clinical
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1177/20552173221105642,
title = {Patient-reported outcome measures in MS: Do development processes and patient involvement support valid quantification of clinically important variables?},
author = {Bharadia T and Vandercappellen J and Chitnis T and Eelen P and Bauer B and Brichetto G and Lloyd A and Schmidt H and King M and Fitzgerald J and Hach T and Hobart J},
year = {2022},
journal = {Multiple sclerosis journal - experimental, translational and clinical},
doi = {10.1177/20552173221105642},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1177/20552173221105642}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Patient-reported outcome measures in MS: Do development processes and patient involvement support valid quantification of clinically important variables? AU - Bharadia T AU - Vandercappellen J AU - Chitnis T AU - Eelen P AU - Bauer B AU - Brichetto G AU - Lloyd A AU - Schmidt H AU - King M AU - Fitzgerald J AU - Hach T AU - Hobart J PY - 2022 JO - Multiple sclerosis journal - experimental, translational and clinical DO - 10.1177/20552173221105642 UR - https://doi.org/10.1177/20552173221105642 ER -
APA
T, B., J, V., T, C., P, E., B, B., G, B., A, L., H, S., M, K., J, F., T, H., & J, H. (2022). Patient-reported outcome measures in MS: Do development processes and patient involvement support valid quantification of clinically important variables?. Multiple sclerosis journal - experimental, translational and clinical. https://doi.org/10.1177/20552173221105642
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-27T16:29:35.976Z