Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (ALIF) Versus Full-Endoscopic/Percutaneous TLIF With a Large-Footprint Interbody Cage: A Comparative Observational Study.

Morgenstern C, Nogueras F, Delbos G, Morgenstern R

Open source

DOI
10.1177/21925682251316280
Published
2025 Jul
Container
Global spine journal
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
yes

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1177/21925682251316280,
  title = {Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (ALIF) Versus Full-Endoscopic/Percutaneous TLIF With a Large-Footprint Interbody Cage: A Comparative Observational Study.},
  author = {Morgenstern C and Nogueras F and Delbos G and Morgenstern R},
  year = {2025},
  journal = {Global spine journal},
  doi = {10.1177/21925682251316280},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682251316280}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (ALIF) Versus Full-Endoscopic/Percutaneous TLIF With a Large-Footprint Interbody Cage: A Comparative Observational Study.
AU  - Morgenstern C
AU  - Nogueras F
AU  - Delbos G
AU  - Morgenstern R
PY  - 2025
JO  - Global spine journal
DO  - 10.1177/21925682251316280
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682251316280
ER  - 

APA

C, M., F, N., G, D., & R, M. (2025). Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (ALIF) Versus Full-Endoscopic/Percutaneous TLIF With a Large-Footprint Interbody Cage: A Comparative Observational Study.. Global spine journal. https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682251316280

Source records