Impact of Expandable versus Static Interbody Cages on Subsidence and Outcomes in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Shehniamirkhan M, Paeinmahali A, Bagherzadeh S, Safari-Dehnavi N, Roohollahi F, Kim P, Alikhani P, Rostami M

Open source

DOI
10.1177/21925682261460800
Published
2026 Jun 16
Container
Global spine journal
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
yes

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1177/21925682261460800,
  title = {Impact of Expandable versus Static Interbody Cages on Subsidence and Outcomes in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.},
  author = {Shehniamirkhan M and Paeinmahali A and Bagherzadeh S and Safari-Dehnavi N and Roohollahi F and Kim P and Alikhani P and Rostami M},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {Global spine journal},
  doi = {10.1177/21925682261460800},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682261460800}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Impact of Expandable versus Static Interbody Cages on Subsidence and Outcomes in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
AU  - Shehniamirkhan M
AU  - Paeinmahali A
AU  - Bagherzadeh S
AU  - Safari-Dehnavi N
AU  - Roohollahi F
AU  - Kim P
AU  - Alikhani P
AU  - Rostami M
PY  - 2026
JO  - Global spine journal
DO  - 10.1177/21925682261460800
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682261460800
ER  - 

APA

M, S., A, P., S, B., N, S., F, R., P, K., P, A., & M, R. (2026). Impact of Expandable versus Static Interbody Cages on Subsidence and Outcomes in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.. Global spine journal. https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682261460800

Source records