Impact of Expandable versus Static Interbody Cages on Subsidence and Outcomes in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
- DOI
- 10.1177/21925682261460800
- Published
- 2026 Jun 16
- Container
- Global spine journal
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1177/21925682261460800,
title = {Impact of Expandable versus Static Interbody Cages on Subsidence and Outcomes in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.},
author = {Shehniamirkhan M and Paeinmahali A and Bagherzadeh S and Safari-Dehnavi N and Roohollahi F and Kim P and Alikhani P and Rostami M},
year = {2026},
journal = {Global spine journal},
doi = {10.1177/21925682261460800},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682261460800}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Impact of Expandable versus Static Interbody Cages on Subsidence and Outcomes in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. AU - Shehniamirkhan M AU - Paeinmahali A AU - Bagherzadeh S AU - Safari-Dehnavi N AU - Roohollahi F AU - Kim P AU - Alikhani P AU - Rostami M PY - 2026 JO - Global spine journal DO - 10.1177/21925682261460800 UR - https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682261460800 ER -
APA
M, S., A, P., S, B., N, S., F, R., P, K., P, A., & M, R. (2026). Impact of Expandable versus Static Interbody Cages on Subsidence and Outcomes in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.. Global spine journal. https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682261460800
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-25T14:20:57.165Z