Evaluating Return to Sport Outcomes: Arthroscopic Anatomic Glenoid Reconstruction vs. Bankart Repair.

Ojaghi R, Karabanow N, Remedios S, Wong I

Open source

DOI
10.1177/23259671261440934
Published
2026 Jun
Container
Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
yes

Credibility signals

uncertain Score 53/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1177/23259671261440934,
  title = {Evaluating Return to Sport Outcomes: Arthroscopic Anatomic Glenoid Reconstruction vs. Bankart Repair.},
  author = {Ojaghi R and Karabanow N and Remedios S and Wong I},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine},
  doi = {10.1177/23259671261440934},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1177/23259671261440934}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Evaluating Return to Sport Outcomes: Arthroscopic Anatomic Glenoid Reconstruction vs. Bankart Repair.
AU  - Ojaghi R
AU  - Karabanow N
AU  - Remedios S
AU  - Wong I
PY  - 2026
JO  - Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine
DO  - 10.1177/23259671261440934
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1177/23259671261440934
ER  - 

APA

R, O., N, K., S, R., & I, W. (2026). Evaluating Return to Sport Outcomes: Arthroscopic Anatomic Glenoid Reconstruction vs. Bankart Repair.. Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine. https://doi.org/10.1177/23259671261440934

Source records