ASH clinical practice guidelines: evaluation of discordance between certainty of evidence and strength of recommendations.
- DOI
- 10.1182/bloodadvances.2026020781
- Published
- 2026-08-01
- Container
- Blood Adv
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 53/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- supportingDirectory of Open Access Journals: A matching record was returned by DOAJ.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1182/bloodadvances.2026020781,
title = {ASH clinical practice guidelines: evaluation of discordance between certainty of evidence and strength of recommendations.},
author = {Hershenfeld SA and Kunkle R and Pai M and Cuker A and Cheung MC.},
year = {2026},
journal = {Blood Adv},
doi = {10.1182/bloodadvances.2026020781},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2026020781}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - ASH clinical practice guidelines: evaluation of discordance between certainty of evidence and strength of recommendations. AU - Hershenfeld SA AU - Kunkle R AU - Pai M AU - Cuker A AU - Cheung MC. PY - 2026 JO - Blood Adv DO - 10.1182/bloodadvances.2026020781 UR - https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2026020781 ER -
APA
SA, H., R, K., M, P., A, C., & MC., C. (2026). ASH clinical practice guidelines: evaluation of discordance between certainty of evidence and strength of recommendations.. Blood Adv. https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2026020781
Source records
- europe-pmc · retrieved 2026-09-26T00:01:08.712Z
- doaj · retrieved 2026-09-26T00:01:08.713Z