ASH clinical practice guidelines: evaluation of discordance between certainty of evidence and strength of recommendations.

Hershenfeld SA, Kunkle R, Pai M, Cuker A, Cheung MC.

Open source

DOI
10.1182/bloodadvances.2026020781
Published
2026-08-01
Container
Blood Adv
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
yes

Credibility signals

uncertain Score 53/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1182/bloodadvances.2026020781,
  title = {ASH clinical practice guidelines: evaluation of discordance between certainty of evidence and strength of recommendations.},
  author = {Hershenfeld SA and  Kunkle R and  Pai M and  Cuker A and  Cheung MC.},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {Blood Adv},
  doi = {10.1182/bloodadvances.2026020781},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2026020781}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - ASH clinical practice guidelines: evaluation of discordance between certainty of evidence and strength of recommendations.
AU  - Hershenfeld SA
AU  -  Kunkle R
AU  -  Pai M
AU  -  Cuker A
AU  -  Cheung MC.
PY  - 2026
JO  - Blood Adv
DO  - 10.1182/bloodadvances.2026020781
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2026020781
ER  - 

APA

SA, H., R, K., M, P., A, C., & MC., C. (2026). ASH clinical practice guidelines: evaluation of discordance between certainty of evidence and strength of recommendations.. Blood Adv. https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2026020781

Source records