Artificial intelligence outperforms pulmonologists in the interpretation of pulmonary function tests.

Topalovic M, Das N, Burgel PR, Daenen M, Derom E, Haenebalcke C, Janssen R, Kerstjens HAM, Liistro G, Louis R, Ninane V, Pison C, Schlesser M, Vercauter P, Vogelmeier CF, Wouters E, Wynants J, Janssens W, Pulmonary Function Study Investigators, Pulmonary Function Study Investigators:

Open source

DOI: 10.1183/13993003.01660-2018
Published: 2019 Apr
Container: The European respiratory journal
Publisher: Not recorded
Open access: unknown

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1183/13993003.01660-2018,
  title = {Artificial intelligence outperforms pulmonologists in the interpretation of pulmonary function tests.},
  author = {Topalovic M and Das N and Burgel PR and Daenen M and Derom E and Haenebalcke C and Janssen R and Kerstjens HAM and Liistro G and Louis R and Ninane V and Pison C and Schlesser M and Vercauter P and Vogelmeier CF and Wouters E and Wynants J and Janssens W and Pulmonary Function Study Investigators and Pulmonary Function Study Investigators:},
  year = {2019},
  journal = {The European respiratory journal},
  doi = {10.1183/13993003.01660-2018},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.01660-2018}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Artificial intelligence outperforms pulmonologists in the interpretation of pulmonary function tests.
AU  - Topalovic M
AU  - Das N
AU  - Burgel PR
AU  - Daenen M
AU  - Derom E
AU  - Haenebalcke C
AU  - Janssen R
AU  - Kerstjens HAM
AU  - Liistro G
AU  - Louis R
AU  - Ninane V
AU  - Pison C
AU  - Schlesser M
AU  - Vercauter P
AU  - Vogelmeier CF
AU  - Wouters E
AU  - Wynants J
AU  - Janssens W
AU  - Pulmonary Function Study Investigators
AU  - Pulmonary Function Study Investigators:
PY  - 2019
JO  - The European respiratory journal
DO  - 10.1183/13993003.01660-2018
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.01660-2018
ER  -

APA

M, T., N, D., PR, B., M, D., E, D., C, H., R, J., HAM, K., G, L., R, L., V, N., C, P., M, S., P, V., CF, V., E, W., J, W., W, J., Investigators, P. F. S., & Investigators:, P. F. S. (2019). Artificial intelligence outperforms pulmonologists in the interpretation of pulmonary function tests.. The European respiratory journal. https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.01660-2018

Source records

pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T21:11:38.391Z