Percentile-based versus conventional thresholds in cardiopulmonary exercise testing: a retrospective cross-sectional study.

Staes M, Wuyts M, De Vos M, Troosters T, Janssens W

DOI: 10.1183/23120541.01354-2025
Published: 2026 Jul
Container: ERJ open research
Publisher: Not recorded
Open access: yes

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1183/23120541.01354-2025,
  title = {Percentile-based versus conventional thresholds in cardiopulmonary exercise testing: a retrospective cross-sectional study.},
  author = {Staes M and Wuyts M and De Vos M and Troosters T and Janssens W},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {ERJ open research},
  doi = {10.1183/23120541.01354-2025},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1183/23120541.01354-2025}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Percentile-based versus conventional thresholds in cardiopulmonary exercise testing: a retrospective cross-sectional study.
AU  - Staes M
AU  - Wuyts M
AU  - De Vos M
AU  - Troosters T
AU  - Janssens W
PY  - 2026
JO  - ERJ open research
DO  - 10.1183/23120541.01354-2025
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1183/23120541.01354-2025
ER  -

APA

M, S., M, W., M, D. V., T, T., & W, J. (2026). Percentile-based versus conventional thresholds in cardiopulmonary exercise testing: a retrospective cross-sectional study.. ERJ open research. https://doi.org/10.1183/23120541.01354-2025

Source records

pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-25T17:34:03.723Z