What is the most appropriate knowledge synthesis method to conduct a review? Protocol for a scoping review
- DOI
- 10.1186/1471-2288-12-114
- Published
- 2012-08-03
- Container
- BMC Medical Research Methodology
- Publisher
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1186/1471-2288-12-114,
title = {What is the most appropriate knowledge synthesis method to conduct a review? Protocol for a scoping review},
author = {Monika Kastner and Andrea C Tricco and Charlene Soobiah and Erin Lillie and Laure Perrier and Tanya Horsley and Vivian Welch and Elise Cogo and Jesmin Antony and Sharon E Straus},
year = {2012},
journal = {BMC Medical Research Methodology},
doi = {10.1186/1471-2288-12-114},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-12-114}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - What is the most appropriate knowledge synthesis method to conduct a review? Protocol for a scoping review AU - Monika Kastner AU - Andrea C Tricco AU - Charlene Soobiah AU - Erin Lillie AU - Laure Perrier AU - Tanya Horsley AU - Vivian Welch AU - Elise Cogo AU - Jesmin Antony AU - Sharon E Straus PY - 2012 JO - BMC Medical Research Methodology DO - 10.1186/1471-2288-12-114 UR - https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-12-114 ER -
APA
Kastner, M., Tricco, A. C., Soobiah, C., Lillie, E., Perrier, L., Horsley, T., Welch, V., Cogo, E., Antony, J., & Straus, S. E. (2012). What is the most appropriate knowledge synthesis method to conduct a review? Protocol for a scoping review. BMC Medical Research Methodology. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-12-114
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-09-26T04:33:12.820Z