How informed is consent in vulnerable populations? Experience using a continuous consent process during the MDP301 vaginal microbicide trial in Mwanza, Tanzania
- DOI
- 10.1186/1472-6939-11-10
- Published
- 2010-06-13
- Container
- BMC Medical Ethics
- Publisher
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1186/1472-6939-11-10,
title = {How informed is consent in vulnerable populations? Experience using a continuous consent process during the MDP301 vaginal microbicide trial in Mwanza, Tanzania},
author = {Unknown and Andrew Vallely and Shelley Lees and Charles Shagi and Stella Kasindi and Selephina Soteli and Natujwa Kavit and Lisa Vallely and Sheena McCormack and Robert Pool and Richard J Hayes},
year = {2010},
journal = {BMC Medical Ethics},
doi = {10.1186/1472-6939-11-10},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-11-10}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - How informed is consent in vulnerable populations? Experience using a continuous consent process during the MDP301 vaginal microbicide trial in Mwanza, Tanzania AU - Unknown AU - Andrew Vallely AU - Shelley Lees AU - Charles Shagi AU - Stella Kasindi AU - Selephina Soteli AU - Natujwa Kavit AU - Lisa Vallely AU - Sheena McCormack AU - Robert Pool AU - Richard J Hayes PY - 2010 JO - BMC Medical Ethics DO - 10.1186/1472-6939-11-10 UR - https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-11-10 ER -
APA
Unknown, Vallely, A., Lees, S., Shagi, C., Kasindi, S., Soteli, S., Kavit, N., Vallely, L., McCormack, S., Pool, R., & Hayes, R. J. (2010). How informed is consent in vulnerable populations? Experience using a continuous consent process during the MDP301 vaginal microbicide trial in Mwanza, Tanzania. BMC Medical Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-11-10
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-11-10T13:12:30.841Z