Do the UK government's new Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) scores adequately measure primary care performance? A cross-sectional survey of routine healthcare data
- DOI
- 10.1186/1472-6963-7-166
- Published
- 2007-10-17
- Container
- BMC Health Services Research
- Publisher
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1186/1472-6963-7-166,
title = {Do the UK government's new Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) scores adequately measure primary care performance? A cross-sectional survey of routine healthcare data},
author = {Amy Downing and Gavin Rudge and Yaping Cheng and Yu-Kang Tu and Justin Keen and Mark S Gilthorpe},
year = {2007},
journal = {BMC Health Services Research},
doi = {10.1186/1472-6963-7-166},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-7-166}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Do the UK government's new Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) scores adequately measure primary care performance? A cross-sectional survey of routine healthcare data AU - Amy Downing AU - Gavin Rudge AU - Yaping Cheng AU - Yu-Kang Tu AU - Justin Keen AU - Mark S Gilthorpe PY - 2007 JO - BMC Health Services Research DO - 10.1186/1472-6963-7-166 UR - https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-7-166 ER -
APA
Downing, A., Rudge, G., Cheng, Y., Tu, Y., Keen, J., & Gilthorpe, M. S. (2007). Do the UK government's new Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) scores adequately measure primary care performance? A cross-sectional survey of routine healthcare data. BMC Health Services Research. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-7-166
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-09-25T07:42:42.563Z