Are decisions using cost-utility analyses robust to choice of SF-36/SF-12 preference-based algorithm?

Pickard AS, Wang Z, Walton SM, Lee TA

DOI: 10.1186/1477-7525-3-11
Published: 2005 Mar 4
Container: Health and quality of life outcomes
Publisher: Not recorded
Open access: yes

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1186/1477-7525-3-11,
  title = {Are decisions using cost-utility analyses robust to choice of SF-36/SF-12 preference-based algorithm?},
  author = {Pickard AS and Wang Z and Walton SM and Lee TA},
  year = {2005},
  journal = {Health and quality of life outcomes},
  doi = {10.1186/1477-7525-3-11},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-3-11}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Are decisions using cost-utility analyses robust to choice of SF-36/SF-12 preference-based algorithm?
AU  - Pickard AS
AU  - Wang Z
AU  - Walton SM
AU  - Lee TA
PY  - 2005
JO  - Health and quality of life outcomes
DO  - 10.1186/1477-7525-3-11
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-3-11
ER  -

APA

AS, P., Z, W., SM, W., & TA, L. (2005). Are decisions using cost-utility analyses robust to choice of SF-36/SF-12 preference-based algorithm?. Health and quality of life outcomes. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-3-11

Source records

pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-25T22:22:47.002Z