Comparative effectiveness research: challenges for medical journals.
- DOI
- 10.1186/1745-6215-11-45
- Published
- 2010 Apr 28
- Container
- Trials
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1186/1745-6215-11-45,
title = {Comparative effectiveness research: challenges for medical journals.},
author = {Sox HC and Helfand M and Grimshaw J and Dickersin K and PLoS Medicine Editors and Tovey D and Knottnerus JA and Tugwell P},
year = {2010},
journal = {Trials},
doi = {10.1186/1745-6215-11-45},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-11-45}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Comparative effectiveness research: challenges for medical journals. AU - Sox HC AU - Helfand M AU - Grimshaw J AU - Dickersin K AU - PLoS Medicine Editors AU - Tovey D AU - Knottnerus JA AU - Tugwell P PY - 2010 JO - Trials DO - 10.1186/1745-6215-11-45 UR - https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-11-45 ER -
APA
HC, S., M, H., J, G., K, D., Editors, P. M., D, T., JA, K., & P, T. (2010). Comparative effectiveness research: challenges for medical journals.. Trials. https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-11-45
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-27T00:21:57.061Z