Can the SCD test and terminal uridine nick-end labeling by flow cytometry technique (TUNEL/FCM) be used interchangeably to measure sperm DNA damage in routine laboratory practice?

Grèze C, Guttmann A, Pons-Rejraji H, Vasson MP, Lornage J, Ouchchane L, Brugnon F

Open source

DOI
10.1186/s12610-019-0098-2
Published
2019
Container
Basic and clinical andrology
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
yes

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1186/s12610-019-0098-2,
  title = {Can the SCD test and terminal uridine nick-end labeling by flow cytometry technique (TUNEL/FCM) be used interchangeably to measure sperm DNA damage in routine laboratory practice?},
  author = {Grèze C and Guttmann A and Pons-Rejraji H and Vasson MP and Lornage J and Ouchchane L and Brugnon F},
  year = {2019},
  journal = {Basic and clinical andrology},
  doi = {10.1186/s12610-019-0098-2},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s12610-019-0098-2}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Can the SCD test and terminal uridine nick-end labeling by flow cytometry technique (TUNEL/FCM) be used interchangeably to measure sperm DNA damage in routine laboratory practice?
AU  - Grèze C
AU  - Guttmann A
AU  - Pons-Rejraji H
AU  - Vasson MP
AU  - Lornage J
AU  - Ouchchane L
AU  - Brugnon F
PY  - 2019
JO  - Basic and clinical andrology
DO  - 10.1186/s12610-019-0098-2
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1186/s12610-019-0098-2
ER  - 

APA

C, G., A, G., H, P., MP, V., J, L., L, O., & F, B. (2019). Can the SCD test and terminal uridine nick-end labeling by flow cytometry technique (TUNEL/FCM) be used interchangeably to measure sperm DNA damage in routine laboratory practice?. Basic and clinical andrology. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12610-019-0098-2

Source records