Comparison of different statistical approaches for urinary peptide biomarker detection in the context of coronary artery disease.
- DOI
- 10.1186/s12859-016-1390-1
- Published
- 2016 Dec 6
- Container
- BMC bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1186/s12859-016-1390-1,
title = {Comparison of different statistical approaches for urinary peptide biomarker detection in the context of coronary artery disease.},
author = {Stanley E and Delatola EI and Nkuipou-Kenfack E and Spooner W and Kolch W and Schanstra JP and Mischak H and Koeck T},
year = {2016},
journal = {BMC bioinformatics},
doi = {10.1186/s12859-016-1390-1},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-016-1390-1}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Comparison of different statistical approaches for urinary peptide biomarker detection in the context of coronary artery disease. AU - Stanley E AU - Delatola EI AU - Nkuipou-Kenfack E AU - Spooner W AU - Kolch W AU - Schanstra JP AU - Mischak H AU - Koeck T PY - 2016 JO - BMC bioinformatics DO - 10.1186/s12859-016-1390-1 UR - https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-016-1390-1 ER -
APA
E, S., EI, D., E, N., W, S., W, K., JP, S., H, M., & T, K. (2016). Comparison of different statistical approaches for urinary peptide biomarker detection in the context of coronary artery disease.. BMC bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-016-1390-1
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-11-10T13:57:47.056Z