Distinct 5' and 3' coverage biases shape transcriptome interpretation in Nanopore direct RNA versus PCR-cDNA sequencing.
- DOI
- 10.1186/s12864-026-13184-x
- Published
- 2026 Jul 15
- Container
- BMC genomics
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1186/s12864-026-13184-x,
title = {Distinct 5' and 3' coverage biases shape transcriptome interpretation in Nanopore direct RNA versus PCR-cDNA sequencing.},
author = {Lane RE and Calcutt E and Srinivasan A and Gamble V and Oppermann U and Sun J and Cribbs AP},
year = {2026},
journal = {BMC genomics},
doi = {10.1186/s12864-026-13184-x},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-026-13184-x}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Distinct 5' and 3' coverage biases shape transcriptome interpretation in Nanopore direct RNA versus PCR-cDNA sequencing. AU - Lane RE AU - Calcutt E AU - Srinivasan A AU - Gamble V AU - Oppermann U AU - Sun J AU - Cribbs AP PY - 2026 JO - BMC genomics DO - 10.1186/s12864-026-13184-x UR - https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-026-13184-x ER -
APA
RE, L., E, C., A, S., V, G., U, O., J, S., & AP, C. (2026). Distinct 5' and 3' coverage biases shape transcriptome interpretation in Nanopore direct RNA versus PCR-cDNA sequencing.. BMC genomics. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-026-13184-x
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-25T21:05:50.655Z