High-flow nasal oxygen versus conventional nasal cannula for gastroscopy with sedation in elderly patients at high altitudes: a partially-blinded randomized controlled trial in Tibet, China.
- DOI
- 10.1186/s12871-026-03968-9
- Published
- 2026 Jun 15
- Container
- BMC anesthesiology
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 53/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- supportingDirectory of Open Access Journals: A matching record was returned by DOAJ.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1186/s12871-026-03968-9,
title = {High-flow nasal oxygen versus conventional nasal cannula for gastroscopy with sedation in elderly patients at high altitudes: a partially-blinded randomized controlled trial in Tibet, China.},
author = {Zhang J and Cheng N and Bianbawangdui and Tinley and Luo H and Tashiyonten and Wang D and Wang J and Yin X},
year = {2026},
journal = {BMC anesthesiology},
doi = {10.1186/s12871-026-03968-9},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-026-03968-9}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - High-flow nasal oxygen versus conventional nasal cannula for gastroscopy with sedation in elderly patients at high altitudes: a partially-blinded randomized controlled trial in Tibet, China. AU - Zhang J AU - Cheng N AU - Bianbawangdui AU - Tinley AU - Luo H AU - Tashiyonten AU - Wang D AU - Wang J AU - Yin X PY - 2026 JO - BMC anesthesiology DO - 10.1186/s12871-026-03968-9 UR - https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-026-03968-9 ER -
APA
J, Z., N, C., Bianbawangdui, Tinley, H, L., Tashiyonten, D, W., J, W., & X, Y. (2026). High-flow nasal oxygen versus conventional nasal cannula for gastroscopy with sedation in elderly patients at high altitudes: a partially-blinded randomized controlled trial in Tibet, China.. BMC anesthesiology. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-026-03968-9
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-27T00:37:35.657Z
- europe-pmc · retrieved 2026-09-27T00:37:35.654Z
- doaj · retrieved 2026-09-27T00:37:35.658Z