The minimal important difference of patient-reported outcome measures related to female urinary incontinence: a systematic review.
- DOI
- 10.1186/s12874-024-02188-4
- Published
- 2024 Mar 8
- Container
- BMC medical research methodology
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1186/s12874-024-02188-4,
title = {The minimal important difference of patient-reported outcome measures related to female urinary incontinence: a systematic review.},
author = {Barbosa-Silva J and Calixtre LB and Von Piekartz D and Driusso P and Armijo-Olivo S},
year = {2024},
journal = {BMC medical research methodology},
doi = {10.1186/s12874-024-02188-4},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-024-02188-4}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - The minimal important difference of patient-reported outcome measures related to female urinary incontinence: a systematic review. AU - Barbosa-Silva J AU - Calixtre LB AU - Von Piekartz D AU - Driusso P AU - Armijo-Olivo S PY - 2024 JO - BMC medical research methodology DO - 10.1186/s12874-024-02188-4 UR - https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-024-02188-4 ER -
APA
J, B., LB, C., D, V. P., P, D., & S, A. (2024). The minimal important difference of patient-reported outcome measures related to female urinary incontinence: a systematic review.. BMC medical research methodology. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-024-02188-4
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T13:33:50.755Z
- europe-pmc · retrieved 2026-09-26T13:33:50.752Z