A comparison of frequentist and Bayesian approaches to the Personalised Randomised Controlled Trial (PRACTical)-design and analysis considerations.
- DOI
- 10.1186/s12874-025-02537-x
- Published
- 2025 May 29
- Container
- BMC medical research methodology
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1186/s12874-025-02537-x,
title = {A comparison of frequentist and Bayesian approaches to the Personalised Randomised Controlled Trial (PRACTical)-design and analysis considerations.},
author = {Jackson H and Shou Y and Azad NABM and Chua JW and Perez RL and Wang X and de Kraker MEA and Mo Y},
year = {2025},
journal = {BMC medical research methodology},
doi = {10.1186/s12874-025-02537-x},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-025-02537-x}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - A comparison of frequentist and Bayesian approaches to the Personalised Randomised Controlled Trial (PRACTical)-design and analysis considerations. AU - Jackson H AU - Shou Y AU - Azad NABM AU - Chua JW AU - Perez RL AU - Wang X AU - de Kraker MEA AU - Mo Y PY - 2025 JO - BMC medical research methodology DO - 10.1186/s12874-025-02537-x UR - https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-025-02537-x ER -
APA
H, J., Y, S., NABM, A., JW, C., RL, P., X, W., MEA, D. K., & Y, M. (2025). A comparison of frequentist and Bayesian approaches to the Personalised Randomised Controlled Trial (PRACTical)-design and analysis considerations.. BMC medical research methodology. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-025-02537-x
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T13:16:56.224Z