A systematic review of sample size determination in Bayesian randomized clinical trials: full Bayesian methods are rarely used.
- DOI
- 10.1186/s12874-026-02854-9
- Published
- 2026 Apr 18
- Container
- BMC medical research methodology
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1186/s12874-026-02854-9,
title = {A systematic review of sample size determination in Bayesian randomized clinical trials: full Bayesian methods are rarely used.},
author = {Marks Y and Cunningham J and Jiang A and Li L and Lin YS and McGrory A and Ouyang Y and Tran NA and Wang Y and Heath A},
year = {2026},
journal = {BMC medical research methodology},
doi = {10.1186/s12874-026-02854-9},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-026-02854-9}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - A systematic review of sample size determination in Bayesian randomized clinical trials: full Bayesian methods are rarely used. AU - Marks Y AU - Cunningham J AU - Jiang A AU - Li L AU - Lin YS AU - McGrory A AU - Ouyang Y AU - Tran NA AU - Wang Y AU - Heath A PY - 2026 JO - BMC medical research methodology DO - 10.1186/s12874-026-02854-9 UR - https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-026-02854-9 ER -
APA
Y, M., J, C., A, J., L, L., YS, L., A, M., Y, O., NA, T., Y, W., & A, H. (2026). A systematic review of sample size determination in Bayesian randomized clinical trials: full Bayesian methods are rarely used.. BMC medical research methodology. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-026-02854-9
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-27T10:27:30.196Z