Discrepancies in reporting of study design and analysis methods between protocols and reports of interrupted time series (ITS) studies: a methodological study.
- DOI
- 10.1186/s12874-026-02959-1
- Published
- 2026 Aug 10
- Container
- BMC medical research methodology
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1186/s12874-026-02959-1,
title = {Discrepancies in reporting of study design and analysis methods between protocols and reports of interrupted time series (ITS) studies: a methodological study.},
author = {Nguyen PY and Korevaar E and Page MJ and McKenzie JE and Turner SL},
year = {2026},
journal = {BMC medical research methodology},
doi = {10.1186/s12874-026-02959-1},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-026-02959-1}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Discrepancies in reporting of study design and analysis methods between protocols and reports of interrupted time series (ITS) studies: a methodological study. AU - Nguyen PY AU - Korevaar E AU - Page MJ AU - McKenzie JE AU - Turner SL PY - 2026 JO - BMC medical research methodology DO - 10.1186/s12874-026-02959-1 UR - https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-026-02959-1 ER -
APA
PY, N., E, K., MJ, P., JE, M., & SL, T. (2026). Discrepancies in reporting of study design and analysis methods between protocols and reports of interrupted time series (ITS) studies: a methodological study.. BMC medical research methodology. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-026-02959-1
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-11-10T14:51:43.730Z