Comparison of parametric versus machine-learning multiple imputation in clinical trials with missing continuous outcomes
- DOI
- 10.1186/s12874-026-02962-6
- Published
- 2026-08-03
- Container
- BMC Medical Research Methodology
- Publisher
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1186/s12874-026-02962-6,
title = {Comparison of parametric versus machine-learning multiple imputation in clinical trials with missing continuous outcomes},
author = {Mia S. Tackney and Jonathan W. Bartlett and Elizabeth Williamson and Kim May Lee},
year = {2026},
journal = {BMC Medical Research Methodology},
doi = {10.1186/s12874-026-02962-6},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-026-02962-6}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Comparison of parametric versus machine-learning multiple imputation in clinical trials with missing continuous outcomes AU - Mia S. Tackney AU - Jonathan W. Bartlett AU - Elizabeth Williamson AU - Kim May Lee PY - 2026 JO - BMC Medical Research Methodology DO - 10.1186/s12874-026-02962-6 UR - https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-026-02962-6 ER -
APA
Tackney, M. S., Bartlett, J. W., Williamson, E., & Lee, K. M. (2026). Comparison of parametric versus machine-learning multiple imputation in clinical trials with missing continuous outcomes. BMC Medical Research Methodology. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-026-02962-6
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-11-10T15:11:22.626Z