A meta-analysis of the safety and efficacy of 2 L versus 3 L polyethylene glycol in bowel preparation for colonoscopy.

Wu L, You M, Cheng J, Wang X, Wang Y, Wang T, Li D, Chen M, Ye Z, Zhou M, Ding P

Open source

DOI
10.1186/s12876-025-04250-x
Published
2026 Feb 9
Container
BMC gastroenterology
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
yes

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1186/s12876-025-04250-x,
  title = {A meta-analysis of the safety and efficacy of 2 L versus 3 L polyethylene glycol in bowel preparation for colonoscopy.},
  author = {Wu L and You M and Cheng J and Wang X and Wang Y and Wang T and Li D and Chen M and Ye Z and Zhou M and Ding P},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {BMC gastroenterology},
  doi = {10.1186/s12876-025-04250-x},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-025-04250-x}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - A meta-analysis of the safety and efficacy of 2 L versus 3 L polyethylene glycol in bowel preparation for colonoscopy.
AU  - Wu L
AU  - You M
AU  - Cheng J
AU  - Wang X
AU  - Wang Y
AU  - Wang T
AU  - Li D
AU  - Chen M
AU  - Ye Z
AU  - Zhou M
AU  - Ding P
PY  - 2026
JO  - BMC gastroenterology
DO  - 10.1186/s12876-025-04250-x
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-025-04250-x
ER  - 

APA

L, W., M, Y., J, C., X, W., Y, W., T, W., D, L., M, C., Z, Y., M, Z., & P, D. (2026). A meta-analysis of the safety and efficacy of 2 L versus 3 L polyethylene glycol in bowel preparation for colonoscopy.. BMC gastroenterology. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-025-04250-x

Source records