Contact diaries versus wearable proximity sensors in measuring contact patterns at a conference: method comparison and participants' attitudes.
- DOI
- 10.1186/s12879-016-1676-y
- Published
- 2016 Jul 22
- Container
- BMC infectious diseases
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1186/s12879-016-1676-y,
title = {Contact diaries versus wearable proximity sensors in measuring contact patterns at a conference: method comparison and participants' attitudes.},
author = {Smieszek T and Castell S and Barrat A and Cattuto C and White PJ and Krause G},
year = {2016},
journal = {BMC infectious diseases},
doi = {10.1186/s12879-016-1676-y},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-016-1676-y}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Contact diaries versus wearable proximity sensors in measuring contact patterns at a conference: method comparison and participants' attitudes. AU - Smieszek T AU - Castell S AU - Barrat A AU - Cattuto C AU - White PJ AU - Krause G PY - 2016 JO - BMC infectious diseases DO - 10.1186/s12879-016-1676-y UR - https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-016-1676-y ER -
APA
T, S., S, C., A, B., C, C., PJ, W., & G, K. (2016). Contact diaries versus wearable proximity sensors in measuring contact patterns at a conference: method comparison and participants' attitudes.. BMC infectious diseases. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-016-1676-y
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-25T18:40:40.166Z