A multicenter comparative study of saline contrast electrical impedance tomography method versus CTPA for the diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism: a trial protocol.
- DOI
- 10.1186/s12880-026-02621-8
- Published
- 2026 Aug 3
- Container
- BMC medical imaging
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1186/s12880-026-02621-8,
title = {A multicenter comparative study of saline contrast electrical impedance tomography method versus CTPA for the diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism: a trial protocol.},
author = {Gong C and Yuan S and Xu M and Di C and Xu H and Sun X and Gao Y and Han J and Long Y and Zhao Z and He H},
year = {2026},
journal = {BMC medical imaging},
doi = {10.1186/s12880-026-02621-8},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-026-02621-8}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - A multicenter comparative study of saline contrast electrical impedance tomography method versus CTPA for the diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism: a trial protocol. AU - Gong C AU - Yuan S AU - Xu M AU - Di C AU - Xu H AU - Sun X AU - Gao Y AU - Han J AU - Long Y AU - Zhao Z AU - He H PY - 2026 JO - BMC medical imaging DO - 10.1186/s12880-026-02621-8 UR - https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-026-02621-8 ER -
APA
C, G., S, Y., M, X., C, D., H, X., X, S., Y, G., J, H., Y, L., Z, Z., & H, H. (2026). A multicenter comparative study of saline contrast electrical impedance tomography method versus CTPA for the diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism: a trial protocol.. BMC medical imaging. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-026-02621-8
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-11-10T14:29:28.663Z