Differences in women’s experiences of labour according to type of fetal monitoring: a quantitative analysis of an Australian national survey
- DOI
- 10.1186/s12884-025-07509-z
- Published
- 2025-05-13
- Container
- BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
- Publisher
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1186/s12884-025-07509-z,
title = {Differences in women’s experiences of labour according to type of fetal monitoring: a quantitative analysis of an Australian national survey},
author = {Kate M. Levett and Deborah Fox and Panashe Bamhare and Rebecca Coddington and Kerry L. Sutcliffe and Elizabeth Newnham and Vanessa Scarf},
year = {2025},
journal = {BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth},
doi = {10.1186/s12884-025-07509-z},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-025-07509-z}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Differences in women’s experiences of labour according to type of fetal monitoring: a quantitative analysis of an Australian national survey AU - Kate M. Levett AU - Deborah Fox AU - Panashe Bamhare AU - Rebecca Coddington AU - Kerry L. Sutcliffe AU - Elizabeth Newnham AU - Vanessa Scarf PY - 2025 JO - BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth DO - 10.1186/s12884-025-07509-z UR - https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-025-07509-z ER -
APA
Levett, K. M., Fox, D., Bamhare, P., Coddington, R., Sutcliffe, K. L., Newnham, E., & Scarf, V. (2025). Differences in women’s experiences of labour according to type of fetal monitoring: a quantitative analysis of an Australian national survey. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-025-07509-z
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-09-26T16:17:33.428Z