Comparison of cognitive workload and surgical outcomes between a three-dimensional and conventional microscope macular hole surgery.

Kelkar A, Natarajan S, Kothari A, Bolisetty M

Open source

DOI
10.1186/s12886-024-03361-5
Published
2024 Mar 1
Container
BMC ophthalmology
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
yes

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1186/s12886-024-03361-5,
  title = {Comparison of cognitive workload and surgical outcomes between a three-dimensional and conventional microscope macular hole surgery.},
  author = {Kelkar A and Natarajan S and Kothari A and Bolisetty M},
  year = {2024},
  journal = {BMC ophthalmology},
  doi = {10.1186/s12886-024-03361-5},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-024-03361-5}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Comparison of cognitive workload and surgical outcomes between a three-dimensional and conventional microscope macular hole surgery.
AU  - Kelkar A
AU  - Natarajan S
AU  - Kothari A
AU  - Bolisetty M
PY  - 2024
JO  - BMC ophthalmology
DO  - 10.1186/s12886-024-03361-5
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-024-03361-5
ER  - 

APA

A, K., S, N., A, K., & M, B. (2024). Comparison of cognitive workload and surgical outcomes between a three-dimensional and conventional microscope macular hole surgery.. BMC ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-024-03361-5

Source records