Randomised controlled trial comparing uptake of NHS Health Check in response to standard letters, risk-personalised letters and telephone invitations
- DOI
- 10.1186/s12889-019-6540-8
- Published
- 2019-02-21
- Container
- BMC Public Health
- Publisher
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1186/s12889-019-6540-8,
title = {Randomised controlled trial comparing uptake of NHS Health Check in response to standard letters, risk-personalised letters and telephone invitations},
author = {Christopher J. Gidlow and Naomi J. Ellis and Victoria Riley and Tim Chadborn and Amanda Bunten and Zafar Iqbal and Aliko Ahmed and Alistair Fisher and David Sugden and David Clark-Carter},
year = {2019},
journal = {BMC Public Health},
doi = {10.1186/s12889-019-6540-8},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-6540-8}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Randomised controlled trial comparing uptake of NHS Health Check in response to standard letters, risk-personalised letters and telephone invitations AU - Christopher J. Gidlow AU - Naomi J. Ellis AU - Victoria Riley AU - Tim Chadborn AU - Amanda Bunten AU - Zafar Iqbal AU - Aliko Ahmed AU - Alistair Fisher AU - David Sugden AU - David Clark-Carter PY - 2019 JO - BMC Public Health DO - 10.1186/s12889-019-6540-8 UR - https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-6540-8 ER -
APA
Gidlow, C. J., Ellis, N. J., Riley, V., Chadborn, T., Bunten, A., Iqbal, Z., Ahmed, A., Fisher, A., Sugden, D., & Clark-Carter, D. (2019). Randomised controlled trial comparing uptake of NHS Health Check in response to standard letters, risk-personalised letters and telephone invitations. BMC Public Health. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-6540-8
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-09-26T11:12:00.301Z