Modified high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy versus conventional oxygen therapy in patients undergoing bronchoscopy: a randomized clinical trial.
- DOI
- 10.1186/s12890-021-01744-8
- Published
- 2021 Nov 14
- Container
- BMC pulmonary medicine
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1186/s12890-021-01744-8,
title = {Modified high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy versus conventional oxygen therapy in patients undergoing bronchoscopy: a randomized clinical trial.},
author = {Wang R and Li HC and Li XY and Tang X and Chu HW and Yuan X and Tong ZH and Sun B},
year = {2021},
journal = {BMC pulmonary medicine},
doi = {10.1186/s12890-021-01744-8},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-021-01744-8}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Modified high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy versus conventional oxygen therapy in patients undergoing bronchoscopy: a randomized clinical trial. AU - Wang R AU - Li HC AU - Li XY AU - Tang X AU - Chu HW AU - Yuan X AU - Tong ZH AU - Sun B PY - 2021 JO - BMC pulmonary medicine DO - 10.1186/s12890-021-01744-8 UR - https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-021-01744-8 ER -
APA
R, W., HC, L., XY, L., X, T., HW, C., X, Y., ZH, T., & B, S. (2021). Modified high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy versus conventional oxygen therapy in patients undergoing bronchoscopy: a randomized clinical trial.. BMC pulmonary medicine. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-021-01744-8
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-25T10:31:10.730Z