Concerns about stone free rate and procedure events of percutaneous nephrolithotripsy (PCNL) for 2-4 cm kidney stones by standard-PCNL vs mini-PCNL- comparative randomised study.
- DOI
- 10.1186/s12894-023-01270-1
- Published
- 2023 May 19
- Container
- BMC urology
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1186/s12894-023-01270-1,
title = {Concerns about stone free rate and procedure events of percutaneous nephrolithotripsy (PCNL) for 2-4 cm kidney stones by standard-PCNL vs mini-PCNL- comparative randomised study.},
author = {Wishahi M and El Feel A and Elkhouly A and Fahmy A and Roshdy M and Elbaz AG and Kamel AI and Badawy M and Elesaily K and Eldahshan S and Ali A and Meheina A and Abdelwahed M},
year = {2023},
journal = {BMC urology},
doi = {10.1186/s12894-023-01270-1},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-023-01270-1}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Concerns about stone free rate and procedure events of percutaneous nephrolithotripsy (PCNL) for 2-4 cm kidney stones by standard-PCNL vs mini-PCNL- comparative randomised study. AU - Wishahi M AU - El Feel A AU - Elkhouly A AU - Fahmy A AU - Roshdy M AU - Elbaz AG AU - Kamel AI AU - Badawy M AU - Elesaily K AU - Eldahshan S AU - Ali A AU - Meheina A AU - Abdelwahed M PY - 2023 JO - BMC urology DO - 10.1186/s12894-023-01270-1 UR - https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-023-01270-1 ER -
APA
M, W., A, E. F., A, E., A, F., M, R., AG, E., AI, K., M, B., K, E., S, E., A, A., A, M., & M, A. (2023). Concerns about stone free rate and procedure events of percutaneous nephrolithotripsy (PCNL) for 2-4 cm kidney stones by standard-PCNL vs mini-PCNL- comparative randomised study.. BMC urology. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-023-01270-1
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-27T08:17:57.157Z