Cost-effectiveness analysis: nonsurgical root canal treatment versus single-tooth implant.

Zang HL, Zhang Y, Hao XW, Yang L, Liang YH

Open source

DOI: 10.1186/s12903-023-03173-x
Published: 2023 Jul 15
Container: BMC oral health
Publisher: Not recorded
Open access: yes

Credibility signals

uncertain Score 53/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
supportingDirectory of Open Access Journals: A matching record was returned by DOAJ. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1186/s12903-023-03173-x,
  title = {Cost-effectiveness analysis: nonsurgical root canal treatment versus single-tooth implant.},
  author = {Zang HL and Zhang Y and Hao XW and Yang L and Liang YH},
  year = {2023},
  journal = {BMC oral health},
  doi = {10.1186/s12903-023-03173-x},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-03173-x}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Cost-effectiveness analysis: nonsurgical root canal treatment versus single-tooth implant.
AU  - Zang HL
AU  - Zhang Y
AU  - Hao XW
AU  - Yang L
AU  - Liang YH
PY  - 2023
JO  - BMC oral health
DO  - 10.1186/s12903-023-03173-x
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-03173-x
ER  -

APA

HL, Z., Y, Z., XW, H., L, Y., & YH, L. (2023). Cost-effectiveness analysis: nonsurgical root canal treatment versus single-tooth implant.. BMC oral health. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-03173-x

Source records

pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-27T14:18:33.809Z
europe-pmc · retrieved 2026-09-27T14:18:33.818Z
doaj · retrieved 2026-09-27T14:18:33.802Z