Dimensional accuracy of three techniques for full-arch implant impressions: orthodontic elastomeric chain versus floss-resin and non-splinted methods.

Türk AG, Güneş N, Mavi F, Gürbüz O, Ulusoy M, Saklakoğlu İE

Open source

DOI
10.1186/s12903-026-08549-3
Published
2026 May 13
Container
BMC oral health
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
yes

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1186/s12903-026-08549-3,
  title = {Dimensional accuracy of three techniques for full-arch implant impressions: orthodontic elastomeric chain versus floss-resin and non-splinted methods.},
  author = {Türk AG and Güneş N and Mavi F and Gürbüz O and Ulusoy M and Saklakoğlu İE},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {BMC oral health},
  doi = {10.1186/s12903-026-08549-3},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-026-08549-3}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Dimensional accuracy of three techniques for full-arch implant impressions: orthodontic elastomeric chain versus floss-resin and non-splinted methods.
AU  - Türk AG
AU  - Güneş N
AU  - Mavi F
AU  - Gürbüz O
AU  - Ulusoy M
AU  - Saklakoğlu İE
PY  - 2026
JO  - BMC oral health
DO  - 10.1186/s12903-026-08549-3
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-026-08549-3
ER  - 

APA

AG, T., N, G., F, M., O, G., M, U., & İE, S. (2026). Dimensional accuracy of three techniques for full-arch implant impressions: orthodontic elastomeric chain versus floss-resin and non-splinted methods.. BMC oral health. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-026-08549-3

Source records