Cost-effectiveness of short implants (6-8.5 mm) compared to regular length implants (> 10 mm) with bone regeneration in posterior atrophic mandible: a 8-year microsimulation model.

Sáenz-Ravello G, Baeza M, Fan S, De-la-Rosa-Gay C, Valmaseda-Castellón E, Mattheos N

Open source

DOI
10.1186/s12903-026-09152-2
Published
2026 Jul 10
Container
BMC oral health
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
yes

Credibility signals

uncertain Score 53/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1186/s12903-026-09152-2,
  title = {Cost-effectiveness of short implants (6-8.5 mm) compared to regular length implants (> 10 mm) with bone regeneration in posterior atrophic mandible: a 8-year microsimulation model.},
  author = {Sáenz-Ravello G and Baeza M and Fan S and De-la-Rosa-Gay C and Valmaseda-Castellón E and Mattheos N},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {BMC oral health},
  doi = {10.1186/s12903-026-09152-2},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-026-09152-2}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Cost-effectiveness of short implants (6-8.5 mm) compared to regular length implants (> 10 mm) with bone regeneration in posterior atrophic mandible: a 8-year microsimulation model.
AU  - Sáenz-Ravello G
AU  - Baeza M
AU  - Fan S
AU  - De-la-Rosa-Gay C
AU  - Valmaseda-Castellón E
AU  - Mattheos N
PY  - 2026
JO  - BMC oral health
DO  - 10.1186/s12903-026-09152-2
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-026-09152-2
ER  - 

APA

G, S., M, B., S, F., C, D., E, V., & N, M. (2026). Cost-effectiveness of short implants (6-8.5 mm) compared to regular length implants (> 10 mm) with bone regeneration in posterior atrophic mandible: a 8-year microsimulation model.. BMC oral health. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-026-09152-2

Source records