AI-augmented versus expert-authored multiple-choice questions: a psychometric comparison in a high-stakes specialty examination
- DOI
- 10.1186/s12909-026-10082-4
- Published
- 2026-08-07
- Container
- BMC Medical Education
- Publisher
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1186/s12909-026-10082-4,
title = {AI-augmented versus expert-authored multiple-choice questions: a psychometric comparison in a high-stakes specialty examination},
author = {Wilma Anschuetz and Daniel Stricker and Claudia Canonica and Céline Montavon and Christian De Geyter and Sören Huwendiek},
year = {2026},
journal = {BMC Medical Education},
doi = {10.1186/s12909-026-10082-4},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-026-10082-4}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - AI-augmented versus expert-authored multiple-choice questions: a psychometric comparison in a high-stakes specialty examination AU - Wilma Anschuetz AU - Daniel Stricker AU - Claudia Canonica AU - Céline Montavon AU - Christian De Geyter AU - Sören Huwendiek PY - 2026 JO - BMC Medical Education DO - 10.1186/s12909-026-10082-4 UR - https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-026-10082-4 ER -
APA
Anschuetz, W., Stricker, D., Canonica, C., Montavon, C., Geyter, C. D., & Huwendiek, S. (2026). AI-augmented versus expert-authored multiple-choice questions: a psychometric comparison in a high-stakes specialty examination. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-026-10082-4
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-11-06T03:12:38.914Z